PRINCETON, NJ -- Fifty-eight percent of Americans say health insurance companies would be justified in setting higher rates for people who smoke. This is on par with the 60% seen in 2011, but down modestly from 65% in 2003. Fewer, 41%, support setting higher rates for those who are significantly overweight, but this is among the higher support levels that Â鶹´«Ã½AV has found for this policy in the last decade.
These data, from Â鶹´«Ã½AV's annual Consumption Habits survey, conducted July 10-14, have particular relevance because the recent healthcare legislation includes a provision allowing health insurance companies to charge higher rates for smokers.
While a clear majority of Americans support setting higher health insurance rates for smokers, less than half say overweight Americans deserve the same treatment. This may reflect the prevalence of these issues in the U.S.: while 45% of Americans in Â鶹´«Ã½AV's July Consumption Habits survey say they are overweight, .
Americans' Smoking, Weight Status Related to Views of Higher Insurance Rates
Americans who smoke or are overweight are less likely to support punitive insurance rates that would affect them personally. Twenty-eight percent of Americans who have smoked in the last week feel that higher insurance rates for smokers are justified, compared with 65% of those who have not smoked.
Similarly, 34% of Americans who say they are overweight support setting higher health insurance rates for those who are overweight, contrasted with 47% among those who consider their weight to be about right.
Republicans More Likely to Support Higher Rates for Smokers, the Overweight
Republicans (47%) are more likely than Democrats (37%) to say it is justifiable to have higher health insurance rates for people who are significantly overweight. Republicans are also slightly more supportive than Democrats of setting higher insurance rates for smokers. Differences in smoking and weight status cannot explain these partisan differences: Democrats are one percentage point more likely to be overweight and to smoke than are Republicans.
Bottom Line
The majority of Americans believe that setting higher health insurance rates for smokers is justified, likely driven in part by the widespread support for this policy among nonsmokers. Fewer than half of Americans overall believe it would be justified to set higher health insurance rates for those who are significantly overweight, a policy that does not reach majority support even among those who feel their weight is about right.
Skyrocketing health insurance costs have raised the issue of whether insurers should be able to charge higher rates for higher-risk policyholders. The Affordable Care Act includes a provision that allows insurance companies to charge higher rates for higher-risk policyholders, up to 1.5 times higher for people who smoke. However, a new regulation exempts those who are trying to quit smoking through a tobacco cessation program from this requirement.
Support for higher health insurance rates for smokers and the significantly overweight is stronger among Republicans than among Democrats. The fact that higher rates for smokers are more widely considered justifiable than such rates for the significantly overweight may have contributed to the former's inclusion in the ACA.
Survey Methods
Results for this Â鶹´«Ã½AV poll are based on telephone interviews conducted July 10-14, 2013, on the Â鶹´«Ã½AV Daily tracking survey, with a random sample of 2,027 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the margin of sampling error is ±3 percentage points.
For results based on the total sample of smokers, one can say with 95% confidence that the margin of sampling error is ±6 percentage points.
Interviews are conducted with respondents on landline telephones and cellular phones, with interviews conducted in Spanish for respondents who are primarily Spanish-speaking. Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 50% cellphone respondents and 50% landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by region. Landline and cell telephone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods. Landline respondents are chosen at random within each household on the basis of which member had the most recent birthday.
Samples are weighted to correct for unequal selection probability, nonresponse, and double coverage of landline and cell users in the two sampling frames. They are also weighted to match the national demographics of gender, age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, education, region, population density, and phone status (cellphone only/landline only/both, and cellphone mostly). Demographic weighting targets are based on the March 2012 Current Population Survey figures for the aged 18 and older U.S. population. Phone status targets are based on the July-December 2011 National Health Interview Survey. Population density targets are based on the 2010 census. All reported margins of sampling error include the computed design effects for weighting.
In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.
View methodology, full question results, and trend data.
For more details on Â鶹´«Ã½AV's polling methodology, visit .
