麻豆传媒AV

The American public soundly disagrees with candidate Ted Cruz's proposal to eliminate four departments of government and also comes down against his proposal to abolish the IRS. This presents a fascinating portrait of a population of people who are very negative about government in general, and yet tend to be unenthusiastic about proposals to eliminate a lot of government. Obviously, as I'll discuss below, there are other approaches to the crisis of confidence in government that the people prefer.

We've been documenting the American public's reaction to many of the policy proposals made by the major presidential candidates on the campaign trail and as part of their overall campaign strategy. In this instance, I'm looking at the reaction of the public to four specific proposals made by Ted Cruz -- proposals that arise from his overall broadly anti-government stance.

Two of these proposals involve eliminating whole departments and agencies of government. As seen in the accompanying tables, 63% of Americans disagree with the Cruz proposal to eliminate "the Department of Education, the Department of Energy, the Department of Commerce and the Department of Housing and Urban Development." Just 18% agree. And, when asked about abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, 44% of Americans disagree, 34% agree, while 22% don't have an opinion.

	Agree%	Disagree%	Don't know enough to say%	No answer%
Eliminate the Department of Education, the Department of Energy, the Department of Commerce and the Department of Housing and Urban Development	18	63	18	1
Abolish the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS	34	44	21	1
March 9-14, 2016
麻豆传媒AV Daily tracking

Cruz has also proposed both a hiring freeze on all civilian jobs in the executive branch and enacting a requirement that three government employees leave the federal government before the government can hire one new employee. Americans' reactions to these proposals are somewhat less negative than to his proposals to cut government departments and agencies. About four in 10 don't have an opinion on these ideas. Among those who do have an opinion, the proposals essentially break even. Thus, from the big picture perspective, when Cruz makes these proposals, he gets an immediately positive reaction from just about one-third of the people.

	Agree%	Disagree%	Don't know enough to say%	No answer%
Enact a hiring freeze for all civilian jobs in the executive branch of government	33	28	39	*
Require that three government employees leave the federal government before the government can hire one new employee	29	31	40	--
March 9-14, 2016
麻豆传媒AV Daily tracking

When we last asked about the of the federal government it came in at 25% positive and 54% negative, the worst of any business and industry sector measured. Plus, Americans say that the federal government 51 cents of every dollar it spends. Plus, half of Americans say that the federal government poses an immediate to the rights and freedoms of the citizens of the country. Plus, six in 10 say the federal government has too much .

No question, then, that Cruz is making his proposals in an environment in which the public appears to be very anti-government. One might hypothesize that the public would go along with his ideas about slashing government departments and cutting back on government employees. But Americans don't. His proposals, in essence, don't pass muster with a majority of the general American public.

There are two possible explanations for this. First, much of Americans' ire at the government is apparently taken out specifically on the body of which Cruz is a member -- U.S. Congress, rather than on government departments, agencies and employees. Congress is now at 13%, and in the legislative branch of government is at or near record lows. A quick aside: Another question in sequence of testing policy proposals shows there is strong support (71%) for the idea of term-limiting members of Congress.

Second, while Americans are down on government in general, they are not strongly in Cruz's philosophical camp when it comes to his conviction that the federal government should be severely limited in what it does. Our , in fact, shows that only about a third of Americans favor limiting government to performing only basic functions, a third favor government being empowered to do all it can to fix problems and a third are in the middle between these two extremes. Thus, Cruz is simply fighting an apparent uphill battle -- with the public taken as a whole -- in his philosophical position that government must be scaled back.

The tests reviewed here are based on immediate, top-of-mind reactions to policy proposals as made by the candidates. It's certainly possible that further elaboration and discussion of the proposals would move the public more in one direction or the other. But we learn a lot from these data. Namely that, on the face of it, the idea of cutting back government departments and agencies, and severely limiting employment in the federal government, simply doesn't generate a lot of positive enthusiasm from the American public.