麻豆传媒AV

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Nearly two-thirds of Americans (65%) think the U.S. government should use drones to launch airstrikes in other countries against suspected terrorists. Americans are, however, much less likely to say the U.S. should use drones to launch airstrikes in other countries against U.S. citizens living abroad who are suspected terrorists (41%); to launch airstrikes in the U.S. against suspected terrorists living here (25%); and to launch airstrikes in the U.S. against U.S. citizens living here who are suspected terrorists (13%).

These data are from 麻豆传媒AV Daily tracking conducted March 20-21, a few weeks after Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., held a 13-hour filibuster of President Barack Obama's nominee to lead the CIA. Sen. Paul pledged to speak until the administration clarified whether the government could conduct a drone strike against a U.S. citizen on domestic soil. Attorney General Eric Holder responded after the filibuster ended that the president does not have the authority to use a drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on U.S. soil.

The survey results suggest that a majority of Americans would agree with previous U.S. drone attacks that have killed suspected terrorists living in other countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. However, the data indicate that less than a majority of Americans would have in principle supported the drone attack in the fall of 2011 against American citizens who were suspected terrorists living in Yemen. And the results show that substantial majorities of Americans are opposed to drone airstrikes "in the U.S.," regardless of whether they are against U.S. citizens.

The results on using drones on U.S. soil show less support than was found in one other recent poll conducted by . That poll first asked all respondents about using drones to target terrorists in foreign countries -- something Americans generally support -- and this could have in turn affected the way in which respondents answered subsequent questions about drone use on U.S. soil.

麻豆传媒AV asked its drone questions using split half-samples, so those asked about using drones in the U.S. were not first asked about using them overseas, resulting in views not influenced by the context of broader drone use.

Republicans More Likely Than Democrats to Support Drone Use

Republicans are at least somewhat more likely than Democrats and independents to say the U.S. government should use drones in all four circumstances tested in the survey. While a majority in each party says the U.S. government should use drones to launch airstrikes in other countries against suspected terrorists, Republicans (79%) are significantly more likely to say so than are Democrats (55%) and independents (61%).

Half of Republicans say the U.S. government should use drones to launch airstrikes in other countries against U.S. citizens living abroad who are suspected terrorists, compared with 41% of Democrats and 35% of independents who say the same.

Although Republicans are modestly more likely than Democrats or independents to say the U.S. government should use drones in the U.S. against suspected terrorists living here or in the U.S. against U.S. citizens, support is low among all groups.

About Half Following News About Drones Closely

On a relative basis, Americans are not paying a particularly high level of attention to the controversy surrounding the government's use of drones -- 49% are following news about the drones very or somewhat closely, while the same percentage is following the news not too closely or not at all. The 49% "closely following" number is below the 61% average across more than 200 news events that 麻豆传媒AV has measured in this way.

Republicans (59%) are more likely than Democrats (45%) or independents (48%) to say they are following the news about drones very or somewhat closely.

Those Who Are Following Drone News Close More Likely to Support Their Use

Americans who are following news about drones closely are more likely than those who are not following closely to say the U.S. should use drones in each of the four circumstances. In three of the four instances, this is at least partly because those not following the news closely are less likely to have an opinion in either direction. Still, the only circumstance in which a majority of those who are following the news closely say the U.S. should use drones is to launch airstrikes in other countries against suspected terrorists.

Bottom Line

A clear majority of Americans say the U.S. government should use drones to launch airstrikes in other countries against suspected terrorists, but support drops significantly below the majority level when Americans are asked about the use of drones against U.S. citizens, either at home or abroad, or against noncitizens living in the U.S.

Although it was Republican Sen. Paul who filibustered in protest of the potential or possible future use of drones in the U.S., rank-and-file Republicans across the country are actually more supportive of such actions than are independents or Democrats.

And, even with Paul's effort to bring the issue of drones into the national spotlight during his 13-hour filibuster, less than half of Americans are paying very or somewhat close attention to news about the U.S government's use of drones. Americans who are following the news at least somewhat closely are slightly more likely to say the government should use drones in each of the four circumstances.