WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Americans were much more upbeat about the U.S. economy in November than they were in October, but are still less confident than they were in the months before the federal government shutdown. Â鶹´«Ã½AV's Economic Confidence Index averaged -25 in November, improving from -35 in October but still below the -19 found in September. November is the first month that the index has improved since May, when it peaked at -7.
The November results are based on Â鶹´«Ã½AV Daily tracking interviews, conducted by landline and cellphone, with more than 14,000 U.S. adults.
Â鶹´«Ã½AV's Economic Confidence Index is based on two components: Americans' assessments of current economic conditions in the U.S. and their perceptions of whether the economy is getting better or worse. The outlook component, which took the greater hit during the shutdown, improved more than the current conditions component last month.
The net economic outlook score last month improved significantly to -27 from -40 in October, but is still nine points off from September's score. The November score represents 34% of Americans who said the economy is getting better and 61% who said it is getting worse.
The net current conditions score rose to -23 in November from -30 in October, and is four points lower than in September. Last month, 16% of Americans said the economy was excellent or good, while 39% said it was poor.
Economic Confidence Rises Across Partisan and Income Groups
Democrats, independents, and Republicans were much more positive about the economy in November than they were in October, when confidence fell across partisan groups. All three party groups showed similar increases in confidence in November, with Â鶹´«Ã½AV's index up 13 points each among Democrats and independents, and up 10 points among Republicans.
Democrats' confidence returned to positive territory this month after falling below zero in October for the first time since January 2012. Overall, Democrats remain significantly more confident in the economy than independents and Republicans.
Economic confidence also increased in November across income groups, but remains below pre-shutdown levels. Upper-income Americans' confidence averaged -16 in November and has been stuck in negative territory since August, after entering positive territory for the first time in May. Middle- and lower-income Americans' confidence has not been on the plus side since Â鶹´«Ã½AV began tracking economic confidence daily in 2008.
Implications
The October government shutdown profoundly affected Americans' economic confidence, and even more than a month after it ended, their confidence has not yet fully recovered. Still, the index's November improvement of 10 points shows that Americans' confidence is more resilient now than it was after the 2011 debt crisis and the 2008-2009 economic recession. While U.S. stock prices plummeted after those events, they set record highs in November, which may have boosted consumer confidence.
In addition to feeling more positive about the economy last month, Americans also reported than they did in October. These may be positive signs for holiday spending in the weeks ahead.
Â鶹´«Ã½AV.com reports results from these indexes in daily, weekly, and monthly averages and in Â鶹´«Ã½AV.com stories. Complete trend data are always available to view and export in the following charts:
Daily: , , ,
Weekly: , , ,
about Â鶹´«Ã½AV's economic measures.
our economic release schedule.
Survey Methods
Results for this Â鶹´«Ã½AV poll are based on telephone interviews conducted Nov. 1-30, 2013, on the Â鶹´«Ã½AV Daily tracking survey, with a random sample of 14,285 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±2 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.
Interviews are conducted with respondents on landline telephones and cellular phones, with interviews conducted in Spanish for respondents who are primarily Spanish-speaking. Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 50% cellphone respondents and 50% landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by region. Landline and cell telephone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods. Landline respondents are chosen at random within each household on the basis of which member had the most recent birthday.
Samples are weighted to correct for unequal selection probability, nonresponse, and double coverage of landline and cell users in the two sampling frames. They are also weighted to match the national demographics of gender, age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, education, region, population density, and phone status (cellphone only/landline only/both, and cellphone mostly). Demographic weighting targets are based on the March 2012 Current Population Survey figures for the aged 18 and older U.S. population. Phone status targets are based on the July-December 2011 National Health Interview Survey. Population density targets are based on the 2010 census. All reported margins of sampling error include the computed design effects for weighting.
In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.
For more details on Â鶹´«Ã½AV's polling methodology, visit .
