PRINCETON, NJ -- Reinforcing the power party identification has in shaping Americans' views of many aspects of the world around them, Republicans and Democrats differ by at least 10 percentage points in their honesty and ethics ratings of six of 22 professions included in Â鶹´«Ã½AV's 2013 update. Republicans rate the honesty and ethical standards of police officers, clergy, military officers, and pharmacists higher than Democrats do. In turn, Democrats are more positive about judges and TV reporters.
Republicans may give higher ratings of police officers, clergy, and military officers because those people work in traditional institutions in American society, which Republicans may hold in greater esteem because of their generally conservative ideology. Republicans have consistently rated those professions higher than Democrats in recent years. Greater among Republicans than among Democrats also factors in to Republicans' higher ratings of clergy.
Â鶹´«Ã½AV just released its annual , with nurses again topping the list, followed by pharmacists and grade school teachers. Republicans and Democrats alike give each of those professions high ratings, with little difference by party in ratings of nurses and grade school teachers.
Democrats' higher ratings of TV reporters, newspaper reporters, judges, and lawyers may be related to their greater affinity with the media and legal professions. Â鶹´«Ã½AV has consistently shown Democrats expressing higher than Republicans do, and rating than Republicans do.
Younger Americans Generally Give Higher Honesty and Ethics Ratings
Younger adults -- those between the ages of 18 and 34 -- rate all but four of the 22 professions tested at least marginally more positively than those aged 55 and older. That suggests younger Americans may be more trusting, or perhaps less cynical, than older Americans.
The primary profession rated more positively by older than younger Americans is the clergy, with an 18-point difference. Younger Americans, , likely also hold religious leaders in lower esteem than older Americans do.
Younger Americans rate judges' and lawyers' honesty and ethical standards much higher than older Americans do.
They are also significantly more likely to give higher ratings to day care providers, nursing home operators, and grade school teachers. Younger adults clearly have more recent experience with grade school teachers, and likely day care as well. Many of today's younger adults may themselves have attended day care regularly, given the increasing percentage of single-parent or two-working-parent homes, or may currently have a child of their own in day care.
It is unclear why younger Americans are more positive about the honesty of nursing home operators. One possibility is that older Americans may be more familiar than younger Americans with past reports of neglect and abuse at nursing homes.
Older and younger Americans rate the top two overall professions -- nurses and pharmacists -- similarly.
Implications
Americans probably base their honesty and ethics ratings of professions on various information sources. One is clearly stereotypes of the kinds of people who enter into certain professions, with Americans generally holding car salespeople, lobbyists, and lawyers in lower regard, even though there are surely some honest people working in those professions. A second source could be Americans' own real-world experience with people who work in those professions. A third important source are news stories, particularly scandals, involving certain professions.
But Americans' political and ideological beliefs also appear to color their opinions. Certainly Republicans' tendency to be more religious is a key factor in their more positive ratings of clergy, and Democrats' generally higher trust in the news media is a factor in their ratings of news reporters.
Also, one's stage in life appears to make a difference in how one rates various professions. Younger Americans have typically given higher honesty and ethics ratings than older Americans to most professions.
Survey Methods
Results for this Â鶹´«Ã½AV poll are based on telephone interviews conducted Dec. 5-8, 2013, with a random sample of 1,031 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.
For results based on the sample of 270 Republicans and 287 Democrats, the margin of sampling error is ±8 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.
For results based on the sample of 190 adults aged 18 to 34, the margin of sampling error is ±9 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.
For results based on the sample of 536 adults aged 55 and older, the margin of sampling error is ±5 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.
Interviews are conducted with respondents on landline telephones and cellular phones, with interviews conducted in Spanish for respondents who are primarily Spanish-speaking. Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 50% cellphone respondents and 50% landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by region. Landline and cell telephone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods. Landline respondents are chosen at random within each household on the basis of which member had the most recent birthday.
Samples are weighted to correct for unequal selection probability, nonresponse, and double coverage of landline and cell users in the two sampling frames. They are also weighted to match the national demographics of gender, age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, education, region, population density, and phone status (cellphone only/landline only/both, and cellphone mostly). Demographic weighting targets are based on the March 2012 Current Population Survey figures for the aged 18 and older U.S. population. Phone status targets are based on the July-December 2011 National Health Interview Survey. Population density targets are based on the 2010 census. All reported margins of sampling error include the computed design effects for weighting.
In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.
For more details on Â鶹´«Ã½AV's polling methodology, visit .
