WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Â鶹´«Ã½AV's Economic Confidence Index averaged -17 in March, essentially the same as the -16 measured in January and February.
The index increased to -7 in May 2013, but then slowly declined. The average plummeted sharply to -35 in October amid the federal government shutdown, but gradually improved toward the end of 2013. Confidence has held steady since the beginning of 2014.
The March results are based on Â鶹´«Ã½AV Daily tracking interviews with more than 15,000 U.S. adults. Â鶹´«Ã½AV has been tracking Americans' confidence in the economy daily since 2008. In that time, the monthly index score has ranged from last May's high of -7 to a low of -60 in October 2008 during the economic recession.
The Â鶹´«Ã½AV Economic Confidence Index is the average of two components: Americans' views on the current economic situation and their perceptions of whether the economy is getting better or worse. The theoretical high is 100, if all Americans were to say the economy is "excellent" or "good" and that it is getting better; the theoretical low is -100, if all Americans were to say the economy is "poor" and getting worse.
In March, 19% of Americans rated the economy as excellent or good, while 36% rated it as poor, for a current conditions score of -17, . Meanwhile, 39% of Americans said the economy is getting better, while 56% said it is getting worse, for an economic outlook score of -17, slightly more negative than the -15 found in February.
Upper-Income Americans Still More Confident Than Those Who Make Less
Americans who make $90,000 or more in annual household income tend to have more confidence in the economy than those who make less. Upper-income Americans had an index score of -7 in March, while middle- and lower-income Americans had an index score of -19.
Upper-income Americans had a positive index score in May through July of 2013, and almost crossed that threshold again at the start of 2014. However, their score has dropped each month since January, while middle- and lower-income Americans have had a lower, but steadier, score.
Younger Americans More Confident in the Economy Than Older Americans
Younger Americans, those aged 18 to 29, are consistently more confident in the economy than older Americans. The index score among 18- to 29-year-olds averaged -3 in March , compared with the -14 found for Americans aged 30 to 49, -23 for 50- to 64-year-olds, and -28 for Americans 65 and older.
Younger Americans are than . Democrats overall have had a consistently since Barack Obama became president. These age differences reflect at least in part the powerful effect of politics on economic confidence.
Implications
Americans continue to be more negative than positive about the economy, and their level of confidence has not changed much in 2014 after the post-shutdown recovery in economic confidence in November and December. Still, Americans are more confident in the economy on a relative basis than at most other times since 2008.
As has been the case for the past couple of years, Americans' confidence reflects various mixed signals about the health of the overall economy. There are positive signs such as declining unemployment, growing GDP, and a recovering housing market. But some negative signs remain, such as relatively limited economic growth and an unemployment rate still higher than it was before the recession. Americans may need to see more consistently positive news before they are ready to give the economy a positive review overall.
Â鶹´«Ã½AV.com reports results from these indexes in daily, weekly, and monthly averages and in Â鶹´«Ã½AV.com stories. Complete trend data are always available to view and export in the following charts:
Daily: , , ,
Weekly: , , ,
about Â鶹´«Ã½AV's economic measures.
our economic release schedule.
Survey Methods
Results for this Â鶹´«Ã½AV poll are based on telephone interviews conducted March 1-31, 2014, on the Â鶹´«Ã½AV Daily tracking survey, with a random sample of 15,166 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±1 percentage point at the 95% confidence level.
Interviews are conducted with respondents on landline telephones and cellular phones, with interviews conducted in Spanish for respondents who are primarily Spanish-speaking. Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 50% cellphone respondents and 50% landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by time zone within region. Landline and cellular telephone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods. Landline respondents are chosen at random within each household on the basis of which member had the most recent birthday.
Samples are weighted to correct for unequal selection probability, nonresponse, and double coverage of landline and cell users in the two sampling frames. They are also weighted to match the national demographics of gender, age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, education, region, population density, and phone status (cellphone only/landline only/both, and cellphone mostly). Demographic weighting targets are based on the most recent Current Population Survey figures for the aged 18 and older U.S. population. Phone status targets are based on the most recent National Health Interview Survey. Population density targets are based on the most recent U.S. census. All reported margins of sampling error include the computed design effects for weighting.
In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.
For more details on Â鶹´«Ã½AV's polling methodology, visit .
