Â鶹´«Ã½AV

skip to main content
Election 2016
Americans More Positive About Democratic Than GOP Convention
Election 2016

Americans More Positive About Democratic Than GOP Convention

by

Story Highlights

  • 44% view Democratic Party more favorably after convention
  • 35% were more positive about GOP after its convention
  • Clinton's acceptance speech rated better than Trump's

PRINCETON, N.J. -- Americans are evenly divided on whether they view the Democratic Party more favorably (44%) or less favorably (42%) after the party's national convention last week. However, their ratings of the Republican Party after the GOP convention two weeks ago were significantly worse, with 35% saying they viewed the party more favorably and 52% less favorably.

Effect of Conventions on Images of the Democratic and Republican Parties
From what you have seen or heard about this week's [Democratic/Republican] convention, do you have a more favorable or a less favorable opinion of the [Democratic/Republican] Party?
  More favorable Less favorable
  % %
2016 Democratic convention 44 42
2016 Republican convention 35 52
Â鶹´«Ã½AV, July 23-24 and July 29-30, 2016

The results are based on Â鶹´«Ã½AV polls conducted in the days immediately after each party's convention -- the Republican convention in Cleveland from July 18-21 and the Democratic convention in Philadelphia from July 25-28.

Americans' assessments of the effect of the conventions on their image of each party largely mirror their assessments of how the convention will affect their vote in the 2016 election. By 45% to 41%, Americans say they are more rather than less likely to vote for Hillary Clinton based on what they saw or read about the Democratic convention. In contrast, many more Americans said they were less likely (51%) rather than more likely (36%) to vote for Donald Trump as a result of what they saw or read about the Republican convention.

Â鶹´«Ã½AV has asked this question about Democratic and Republican national conventions since 1984, with the exceptions of the 1984 and 1992 Republican conventions. The 2016 Republican convention is the first after which a greater percentage of Americans have said they are "less likely" rather than "more likely" to vote for the party's presidential nominee.

Likelihood to Vote for Party's Presidential Candidate Based on What You Saw/Read About Party's Convention
Based on national adults
  More likely Less likely No difference/No opinion Net (more likely minus less likely)
  % % % pct. pts.
Democratic conventions  
2016 45 41 14 +4
2012 43 38 20 +5
2008 43 29 27 +14
2004 44 30 26 +14
2000 43 28 29 +15
1996 44 29 27 +15
1992 60 15 25 +45
1988 56 21 23 +35
1984 45 29 26 +16
Republican conventions  
2016 36 51 14 -15
2012 40 38 21 +2
2008 43 38 19 +5
2004 41 38 21 +3
2000 44 27 29 +17
1996 45 34 21 +11
1992 n/a n/a n/a n/a
1988 43 27 30 +16
1984 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Â鶹´«Ã½AV

Since 1984, an average of 45% of Americans have said they are more likely to vote for a party's presidential candidate after the party's convention; thus, the Democratic Party's 2016 convention is right at the historical norm. At the same time, the 41% of Americans who say they are less likely to vote for Clinton after the party's convention is among the highest Â鶹´«Ã½AV has measured, while the 14% who said the convention made no difference in their vote or who had no opinion is historically low.

Americans' ratings of recent conventions have tended to be less positive than those of 2000 and before, likely because of the greater party polarization in Americans' attitudes. That is borne out in looking at the results by political party identification of the 2016, 2008 and 2000 conventions -- all years in which an incumbent was not running in either party. In recent election years, supporters of each party have been more inclined to react positively to their own party's convention, but also much more likely to react negatively to the other party's convention. Fewer in each party now say the other party's convention made no difference to their vote or offer no opinion at all.

Likelihood to Vote for Party's Presidential Candidate Based on What You Saw/Read About Party Convention, by Political Party
Based on national adults
  More likely Less likely No difference/ No opinion Net (more likely minus less likely)
  % % % pct. pts.
2016 Democratic convention  
Democrats/Democratic leaners 81 9 10 +72
Republicans/Republican leaners 8 82 10 -74
2016 Republican convention  
Democrats/Democratic leaners 2 88 10 -86
Republicans/Republican leaners 73 13 14 +60
2008 Democratic convention  
Democrats/Democratic leaners 74 8 18 +66
Republicans/Republican leaners 8 59 33 -51
2008 Republican convention  
Democrats/Democratic leaners 11 70 19 -59
Republicans/Republican leaners 78 7 15 +71
2000 Democratic convention  
Democrats/Democratic leaners 67 9 24 +58
Republicans/Republican leaners 15 53 32 -38
2000 Republican convention  
Democrats/Democratic leaners 22 49 29 -27
Republicans/Republican leaners 67 8 25 +59
Â鶹´«Ã½AV

Clinton's Speech Rated More Positively Than Trump's

The most anticipated event at modern political conventions is the presidential nominee's acceptance speech. Overall, 44% of Americans gave Clinton's speech a positive rating, saying it was either "excellent" or "good." That is significantly higher than the 35% who rated Trump's speech positively. In fact, as many Americans rated Trump's speech negatively, saying it was "poor" or "terrible."

Trump's speech was rated less positively than any Â鶹´«Ã½AV has asked about since 1996. The positive rating of Clinton's speech is slightly below the historical average of 47%, but similar to Barack Obama's 2012 acceptance speech. Obama's 2008 speech got the highest percentage of positive ratings at 58%.

Ratings of Presidential Nominee Acceptance Speeches
From what you have heard or read, how would you rate [nominee's] acceptance speech at the [Democratic/Republican] convention on Thursday night, as -- excellent, good, just OK, poor or terrible?
  Excellent/Good Just OK Poor/Terrible Didn't see/No opinion
  % % % %
2016, Clinton 44 17 20 19
2016, Trump 35 18 36 11
2012, Obama 43 17 16 23
2012, Romney 38 21 16 26
2008, McCain 47 22 12 19
2008, Obama 58 15 7 20
2004, Bush 49 19 8 24
2004, Kerry 52 19 9 20
2000, Gore 51 18 6 24
2000, Bush 51 17 4 28
1996, Clinton n/a n/a n/a n/a
1996, Dole 52 21 7 20
Â鶹´«Ã½AV

Implications

The Democratic Party's convention left a considerably more positive impression on the American public than the Republican Party's convention. That is likely to aid the Democratic Party in its quest to win a third consecutive presidential election. However, the Democratic convention's historically average ratings are beneficial only in contrast to the Republicans' historically negative ratings, meaning both parties could have done a better job of appealing to Americans this year.

In the short term, it appears the Democratic Party will leave the convention phase better off than before it began. Â鶹´«Ã½AV tracking finds Clinton's post-convention favorable rating at 44%, up six percentage points from mid-July. That is much higher than Trump's 32% favorable rating in the days after the Democratic convention. Also, Obama's job approval rating is now up to 54%, tied for the highest it has been since early 2013.

In the weeks ahead, both Clinton's favorable rating and Obama's approval rating could fall back somewhat as the campaign moves further away from the Democratic convention. But as of now, these key election indicators suggest the Democrats are in a stronger electoral position than the Republicans, and Trump and the GOP have a little more than three months left to try to change that.

Historical data are available in .

Survey Methods

Results for this Â鶹´«Ã½AV poll are based on telephone interviews conducted July 23-24 (Republican convention) and July 29-30 (Democratic convention), 2016, on the Â鶹´«Ã½AV U.S. Daily survey, with random samples of approximately 1,000 adults each, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. For results based on the total samples of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. All reported margins of sampling error include computed design effects for weighting.

Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 60% cellphone respondents and 40% landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by time zone within region. Landline and cellular telephone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods.

View survey methodology, complete question responses and trends.​

Learn more about how the works.


Â鶹´«Ã½AV /poll/194084/americans-positive-democratic-gop-convention.aspx
Â鶹´«Ã½AV World Headquarters, 901 F Street, Washington, D.C., 20001, U.S.A
+1 202.715.3030