Â鶹´«Ã½AV

skip to main content
Politics
Honesty and Ethics Rating of Clergy Slides to New Low
Politics

Honesty and Ethics Rating of Clergy Slides to New Low

by Art Swift

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Americans' rating of the honesty and ethics of the clergy has fallen to 47%, the first time this rating has dropped below 50% since Â鶹´«Ã½AV first asked about the clergy in 1977. Clergy have historically ranked near the top among professions on this measure, hitting a high rating of 67% in 1985.

Trend: The Clergy's Honesty and Ethical Standards

Â鶹´«Ã½AV has asked Americans to rate the honesty and ethical standards of members of various professions periodically since 1976, and annually since 1990. This year's poll was conducted Dec. 5-8, and finds Americans viewing nurses, pharmacists, and grade school teachers as having the highest ethical standards. Lobbyists, members of Congress, and car salespeople sit at the bottom of the list.

U.S. Views on Honesty and Ethical Standards in Professions, December 2013

Since 2005, more than 80% of Americans have rated nurses as having "high" or "very high" honesty and ethical standards. Nurses have topped the list since 1999, the first year Â鶹´«Ã½AV asked about them -- with the exception of 2001. That year, Â鶹´«Ã½AV included firefighters on a one-time basis, given their prominent role in 9/11 rescue efforts.

In the past, pharmacists and grade school teachers have received high marks on honesty and ethics that are similar to this year's scores. This year's 70% rating for pharmacists is down from its all-time high of 75% last year.

Nursing Home Operators on the Rise, Members of Congress and Lobbyists Remain Low

Several scandals in the 1970s involving nursing home operators rocked that industry for a time, and may partly explain the industry's relatively low honesty and ethics ratings in the late 1990s and early 2000s. However, 32% now say nursing home operators have "very high" or "high" honesty and ethical standards, up from 26% in 2010, and an all-time high in Â鶹´«Ã½AV's trend.

As for the professions at or near the bottom of the list, members of Congress continue to poll in the single digits, which mirrors Congress' . Lobbyists are last in honesty and ethical standards, with 6% of Americans rating them as "high" or "very high" in this regard, which is not surprising because seven in 10 Americans have said lobbyists have too much power in the U.S.

Bottom Line

When it comes to honesty or ethical standards, common stereotypes appear to apply to professions or career fields. Nurses, pharmacists, and doctors -- considered to be in "healing" occupations -- rank the highest, while the old typecast of the "used car salesman" persists, with car salespeople ranking near the bottom in honesty and ethics. Politicians -- especially those working for the federal government -- remain in low esteem, mirroring a commonly held distrust of the federal government that has developed in the U.S. in the past 40 to 50 years.

This survey shows these long-held stereotypes are difficult to shake. The relative resurgence of nursing home operators perhaps shows that as scandals fade, opinions about these practitioners are rising. Yet for the most part, in the past decade, perceptions of certain career fields have remained consistent.

If views of a certain profession have changed, it usually has been a function of scandal surrounding it. The Catholic priest abuse stories from the early 2000s helped lead to a sharp drop in Americans' ratings of clergy, a decline from which the profession has yet to fully recover.

Survey Methods

Results for this Â鶹´«Ã½AV poll are based on telephone interviews conducted Dec. 5-8, 2013, on the Â鶹´«Ã½AV Daily tracking survey, with a random sample of 1,031 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.

Interviews are conducted with respondents on landline telephones and cellular phones, with interviews conducted in Spanish for respondents who are primarily Spanish-speaking. Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 50% cellphone respondents and 50% landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by region. Landline and cell telephone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods. Landline respondents are chosen at random within each household on the basis of which member had the most recent birthday.

Samples are weighted to correct for unequal selection probability, nonresponse, and double coverage of landline and cell users in the two sampling frames. They are also weighted to match the national demographics of gender, age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, education, region, population density, and phone status (cellphone only/landline only/both, and cellphone mostly). Demographic weighting targets are based on the March 2012 Current Population Survey figures for the aged 18 and older U.S. population. Phone status targets are based on the July-December 2011 National Health Interview Survey. Population density targets are based on the 2010 census. All reported margins of sampling error include the computed design effects for weighting.

In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.

View methodology, full question results, and trend data.

For more details on Â鶹´«Ã½AV's polling methodology, visit .


Â鶹´«Ã½AV /poll/166298/honesty-ethics-rating-clergy-slides-new-low.aspx
Â鶹´«Ã½AV World Headquarters, 901 F Street, Washington, D.C., 20001, U.S.A
+1 202.715.3030